The simple electronic signature: not so simple after all

Date : Publié par

The Versailles Court of Appeal, in a judgment handed down on November 28, 2023 (CA Versailles, No. 22/06599, Caisse d'Epargne et de Prévoyance IDF v. MX), refused to recognize the reality of the simple electronic signature of a personal loan contract. This is not a rejection, in itself, of the simple level of electronic signature, but rather a sanction for the numerous gaps and imprecisions in the bank's argument in this case.

This sanction recalls the importance in an electronic signature dispute of producing a clear file presenting the process implemented, its technical reliability and, of course, the way in which the signatory was identified.

See full article in EXPERTISES FEBRUARY 2024, p.27

Also read

Electronic signature: judges are rebelling

Date : Publié par
Over the period from the end of March to mid-April 2025, the Courts of Appeal issued about fifteen decisions on electronic signatures. Nearly half of them refuse to acknowledge the signing of the contract electronically, which is an exceptionally high ratio compared to what we used to see. We have analysed these negative decisions
Read more

Judges and electronic signatures definitely do not mix well

Date : Publié par
On April 20, 2023, the Versailles Court of Appeal issued a decision (RG No. 22/04814) by which it recognized the validity of the electronic signature of an account agreement concluded between the Caisse de Crédit Mutuel d'Erquy-Pleneuf and a consumer, but on the basis of a totally astonishing motivation.
Read more

Electronic signature does not constitute consent

Date : Publié par
On June 8, 2023, the Orléans Court of Appeal issued an original and very well-argued ruling on electronic signatures (RG No. 22/00539), concerning a personal credit contract between Carrefour Banque and a borrower.
Read more