The simple electronic signature: not so simple after all

Date : Publié par

The Versailles Court of Appeal, in a judgment handed down on November 28, 2023 (CA Versailles, No. 22/06599, Caisse d'Epargne et de Prévoyance IDF v. MX), refused to recognize the reality of the simple electronic signature of a personal loan contract. This is not a rejection, in itself, of the simple level of electronic signature, but rather a sanction for the numerous gaps and imprecisions in the bank's argument in this case.

This sanction recalls the importance in an electronic signature dispute of producing a clear file presenting the process implemented, its technical reliability and, of course, the way in which the signatory was identified.

See full article in EXPERTISES FEBRUARY 2024, p.27

Also read

Scanned signature is a dubious practice

Date : Publié par
On March 13, 2024 (Commercial Chamber, 22-16.487), the Court of Cassation issued a very interesting ruling on the limits of using scanned signatures to attest to the identity and consent of their author.
Read more

Electronic signature: impact on litigation of the certification of the solution implemented

Date : Publié par
The rulings handed down in early September 2020 by the Toulouse (CA Toulouse, 3rd Ch., 4 September 2020, RG n°19/01990) and Lyon (CA Lyon, 6th Ch., 3 September 2020, RG n°19/06466) Courts of Appeal place a significant emphasis on the certification of the signature solutions implemented. However, it is still necessary to understand the scope of these certifications and their real impact on the reliability of the electronic signature.
Read more

Electronic signature does not constitute consent

Date : Publié par
On June 8, 2023, the Orléans Court of Appeal issued an original and very well-argued ruling on electronic signatures (RG No. 22/00539), concerning a personal credit contract between Carrefour Banque and a borrower.
Read more