Electronic signature does not constitute consent

Date :

On June 8, 2023, the Orléans Court of Appeal issued an original and very well‑argued ruling on electronic signatures (RG No. 22/00539), concerning a personal credit agreement between Carrefour Banque and a borrower. In summary:

  • It shows that the evidence file in no way demonstrates the identity of the signatory because it is not supplemented by documentation of the process proving that the authenticators (email address, telephone number) appearing there are indeed those of the presumed signatory;
  • She herself analyses, using the documents produced, the level of signature used and demonstrates that, contrary to the bank's claims, it was not a qualified signature, and therefore presumed to be reliable;
  • She criticises the lack of a link between the signed contract and the evidence file (e.g. a common reference), joining a position now constant in case law on this subject.

Also read

Date :
Digital accessibility is an obligation for all e_commerce sites for new services from June 28, 2025. Existing "similar" services have an additional 5 years to comply with these obligations. But what is a "similar" service really?
Read more
Date :
On March 13, 2024 (Commercial Chamber, 22-16.487), the Court of Cassation issued a very interesting ruling on the limits of using scanned signatures to attest to the identity and consent of their author.
Read more