A firm in the heart of
digital business

My Firm, dedicated exclusively to professional clients, specializes in business law and new technologies.

I support organizations facing complex legal and technological issues in their internal projects and in their relationships with their customers and partners.

I handle conflictual situations as a mediator, in the most perfect confidentiality, according to a pragmatic and effective methodology.

I manage cross‑border legal contexts, in conjunction with partners or clients based in France, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, England and the United States.

5 good reasons
to call on our firm

  1. A unique dual skill set. Isabelle Renard worked for 20 years in the defense electronics industry in the United States before taking the oath of office in 1999. This dual expertise fuels an approach that is at once practical, strategic, and demanding.
  2. A resolutely tailor‑made approach. All cases are handled personally by Attorney Renard. No middleman: you have direct access to high‑level expertise, without dilution.
  3. Total responsiveness. The firm is structured to handle emergencies in the most efficient way.
  4. Proven experience. Attorney Renard is a recognized expert in business and new technology law, particularly for major banks, insurance companies, and companies in the digital sector.
  5. A constant commitment to key stakeholders. An expert member of the FNTC, Attorney Renard actively participates in national discussions on digital trust, innovative uses, and technological regulation.


Isabelle Renard is an expert member of the FNTC

Our listen courage humility informs your strategic decisions

News
legal & digital

Date :
Most contracts concluded by banking institutions are now signed electronically. And this has many advantages: speed of execution, optimized process and document management, close customer experience... But identity fraud is on the rise in the field of consumer credit, and in four recent cases, the courts of appeal have pointed out some weaknesses in the current procedures.
Read more
Date :
In 2025, the electronic signature was often questioned in court, with a clear expansion into the B to B leasing sector, which until now seemed to be spared from litigation in this area. The financial stakes remain low, but the judges have gained experience, which has resulted in refusals to recognise the electronic signature for poorly argued cases. On the dark side, legal actors are unable to distinguish between the elements that characterize a qualified (presumed reliable) and unqualified electronic signature. This is worrying because "real" qualified electronic signatures are beginning to appear on the market and one may wonder whether this difficulty will not lead to rejections of qualified electronic signatures even though the professionals who implement them expect the greatest judicial certainty, since they are presumed to be reliable.
Read more
Date :
the Court of Appeal of Pau (CA Pau, February 12, 2026, RG n°25/01900) has just issued a very interesting decision relating to the place of conclusion of an electronically signed contract. In that judgment, which concerned an employment contract, it considered that opting for the place of physical location of one or the other of the parties to designate the place of conclusion of the contract does not make sense, because that alleged location results from an IP address, which can be changed or falsified, and adopting that position would lead to a high degree of legal uncertainty.
The impact of this decision is directly related to the question of the law applicable to the contract and/or the competent court when, in the event that the parties had the freedom to choose them, they did not do so.
This is a first, and a very interesting one!
Read more