The right to protection of personal data is not an absolute right

Date :

The Social Chamber of the Court of Cassation issued a judgment on March 8, 2023 (Social Chamber No. 21-12.492) recalling, in reference to point (4) of the introduction to the GDPR, that " the right to the protection of personal data is not an absolute right and must be considered in relation to its function in society and balanced against other fundamental rights, in accordance with the principle of proportionality ."

In this case, the production of other employees' pay slips was essential for an employee to justify her claims. According to the High Court: " the right to proof may justify the production of evidence that infringes on personal life provided that such production is essential to the exercise of this right and that the infringement is proportionate to the aim pursued . "

This reminder seems very timely to us, because some specialists on the subject seem to forget the proportionality criterion included in the GDPR and make this text an absolute and intangible compliance tool, in defiance of simple common sense and by applying the provisions of the text (widely developed by the supervisory authorities) to the point of absurdity in their relations with their partners.

But it is true that common sense and conformity do not always go well together...

Also read

Date :
The European eIDAS V2 Regulation, published in 2024, is best known for the creation of an European wallet comprising standardized digital identity functions. But it has also added to the list of the trust services, such as electronic signature or electronic seal, a "qualified archiving service" which has just taken on its full materiality with the publication on December 16, 2025 of the implementing regulation defining its reference standard.
Date :
The Versailles Court of Appeal, in a judgment handed down on November 28, 2023 (CA Versailles, No. 22/06599, Caisse d'Epargne et de Prévoyance IDF v. MX), refused to recognize the reality of the simple electronic signature of a personal loan contract. This is not a rejection, in itself, of the simple level of electronic signature, but rather a sanction for the numerous gaps and imprecisions in the bank's argument in this case.
Date :
Decisions relating to electronic signatures are increasing in number. More than 200 decisions on the subject were handed down by appeal courts in 2024, twice as many as the previous year. This trend is only likely to continue as the use of electronic signatures becomes widespread across all sectors.