The courts do not recognize the validity of an electronically signed employment contract

Date :

The Riom Court of Appeal issued a decision on October 4, 2022 (RG No. 21/02517) which is noteworthy since this court refuses to take into account an electronically signed employment contract.

The judgment is particularly well reasoned and the Court searches in a reasoned manner for evidence of the reliability of the process implemented. It finds none, the only document provided by the employer in support of the electronic signature being a screenshot of unidentifiable origin and containing only very summary information on the transaction.

For the Court, only the production of a file of evidence "describing the signature process used and the technical processes ensuring its reliability" could have made it possible to recognize the existence of the electronic signature.

Furthermore, in this case, no extrinsic evidence justifying the signing of the contract was provided.

THIS JUDGMENT CONSTITUTES A SERIOUS WARNING AGAINST THE USE OF PROCESSES WHICH HAVE AN ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE ONLY IN THE NAME AND DO NOT ALLOW THE CONSTITUTION OF ARGUMENTED PROOF OF THE TRANSACTION

Also read

Date :
Digital accessibility is an obligation for all e_commerce sites for new services from June 28, 2025. Existing "similar" services have an additional 5 years to comply with these obligations. But what is a "similar" service really?
Read more
Date :
On April 20, 2023, the Versailles Court of Appeal issued a decision (RG No. 22/04814) by which it recognized the validity of the electronic signature of an account agreement concluded between the Caisse de Crédit Mutuel d'Erquy-Pleneuf and a consumer, but on the basis of a totally astonishing motivation.
Read more
Date :
On June 8, 2023, the Orléans Court of Appeal issued an original and very well-argued ruling on electronic signatures (RG No. 22/00539), concerning a personal credit contract between Carrefour Banque and a borrower.
Read more